In 2005, strange intersex fish were found in pristine-looking Boulder Creek, in Colorado among other places in the US. One of the common culprits is thought to be estrogen, much of which is inadvertently released into sewers through the urine of women taking birth control. Studies have shown that estrogen can wreak reproductive havoc on some fish, which spawn infertile offspring sporting a mixture of male and female parts a phenomenon known by science today as “fish feminization.”
To test this idea in the
field, a group of researchers at the University of New Brunswick in Canada conducted
a comprehensive, seven year study of the ecology of a research "lake 260" in Northwest Ontario. The selected lakes were unpolluted and free of
human activities such as farming, water-sports and fishing. From 1999 to 2000 the team
built up a comprehensive picture of the ecology of "lake 260" by
catching fish and invertebrates.
From 2001 to 2003, the researchers added
synthetic estrogen to the lake by pumping it from the back of a
boat three times a week. The idea was to create estrogen levels in the lake
similar to those recorded in lakes and rivers near towns and cities that
receive treated sewage. Researchers then monitored the lake until 2006 and at
the same time carried out similar tests on nearby lakes that had not been laced
with estrogen.
The study concluded that synthetic estrogens
excreted by women taking the birth-control pill do have a dramatic effect on
some fish reproductive fitness and mortality. There was no effect on
the bacteria, algae or invertebrates, but a dramatic effect on some fish
species. That tells the scientists that, as expected, estrogen affects the fish
directly and not via a lower level in the food chain. Three years after the team
stopped adding estrogen to the test lakes, the fish populations have recovered
to pre-experimental levels.
In addition to changes in fish ecology, researchers
at the University of Pittsburgh found that human breast cancer cells
grew twice as fast when exposed to estrogen taken from catfish caught near
untreated sewage overflows. “There is the potential for an increased risk for
those people who are prone to estrogenic cancer,” said Conrad Volz, lead
researcher on the study.
The good news resulting from these experiments is that the adverse effects of estrogen pollution can be reversed. Because of these experiments, there is now a strong case for the development and implementation of better sewage
treatment to break down synthetic estrogens before they make it into the
environment.
In the meantime, what can we do to protect ourselves from potential harm from drinking tap water?
“The best choice,” says Cathy Sherman of the natural health
website Natural News,“would probably be a combination of a reverse osmosis
filter augmented by pre- and post-activated carbon filters.” Installing such a
system just for drinking water is sufficient, she says, given that water used
for cleaning and plumbing doesn’t typically get ingested. In addition, the
non-profit public health and safety agency, NSF International, urges individuals
to not use their toilets or sinks to dispose of unused medications and to opt
for the garbage instead; most modern landfills are lined to keep such
contaminants inside.
Bottoms Up!
No comments:
Post a Comment